Very well done!The film cuts between the present time & flashbacks in a unique way. & what a great story! It's not even sort of Bollywood-ish, but they give a Bollywood nod during the credits.
Slumdog Millionaire on IMDb
Very well done!
***SPOILER ALERT***
I saw this as part of a double feature presented by Backyard Cinema, an event hosted by the Phoenix Independent, Foreign & ArtHouse Film Club. We were outside in very chilly weather, so it was a true sensory experience!
I saw this as part of a double feature presented by Backyard Cinema, an event hosted by the Phoenix Independent, Foreign & ArtHouse Film Club.
I really liked this movie, though it was a bit long. I like stories based on true events. Reality is often more interesting than fiction.
I saw this film for the same reason that I read the Harry Potter books: I like to be informed.
This movie is a snapshot of the Japanese reaction to the end of World War II. It's always interesting to see how other cultures perceive world events. It reminds me how subjective the tale of history really is.
Most people that I talked to who had seen this movie said it wasn't nearly as good as the book, that it paled in comparison. Of course the book is always better, but I got the impression that the movie was just bad. I enjoyed the novel & I like Tom Hanks, so I went ahead & put it on my Netflix queue. Even Netflix estimated that I would give this movie 2.3 stars out of 5. Still, I just had to see for myself.
One of the first movies about a stalker, & Clint Eastwood's first attempt at directing. Wow. That guy has been around a while.
***SPOILER ALERT***
What an exasperating movie! After her husband drags her to the middle of nowhere & then promptly dies, a woman is trapped in the deserts of Brazil, waiting for her chance to escape. With very little dialog & very little to move the film along, I found myself desperate to escape as well. Perhaps the film maker used this technique to make the viewer squirm. If so, he surely succeeded.
Funny, quirky snapshot of a small-town community. Everyone has some sort of disfunctionality. Great character development. Fun for the whole family. There was a dumb & dumber bathroom scene, but if you can overlook that, it's a great film.
I was hoping to get a better connection to my roots with this film, since my mother's side of the family are New Orleans cajuns. The movie is registered as a national treasure & was nominated for an Oscar, though it didn't win. I suppose that's all because of its unique look at the cajun life, & possibly the cinematography. The story was secondary to the imagery & the camera angles.
This movie is utter chaos. Family members die & no one seems to care. Brother & sister have sex all day long. Sister gets raped & is still pining for the boy who did it. Brother likes kissing a toothless woman. WTF? At least this movie was made when Rob Lowe was still cute.
This story of the rich & the poor (& whether or not they can get along) plays over the backdrop of political strife in Chile in 1973.
This movie reminded me of an episode of The Love Boat where Julie, the cruise director, wanted to be a part of the "club" that the male crew members told her existed. They said that to be initiated, she would have to memorize Moby Dick, which starts "Call me Ismael." (The only reason I know that is because of this episode.) She did memorize the book, but it turns out, of course, that the "club" was fake - they never thought she would actually commit the novel to memory. Lucky for her that in the future there is a community of people who have memorized books to preserve them & to protect them from the fire men.
With movies like this, no wonder people believe that love is simple. Two strangers pass in the night, one just as naive as the other. If the story lacked content, the visuals were awesome. I love black & white!
What a crazy visual montage! The "freaks" are real circus sideshow people: a man who walks on his hands because he has no lower body; a woman with no arms who eats, smokes, etc with her feet; a pair of Siamese twins; a man with no arms & no legs who "walks" on his hips & shoulders. & this movie even has a plot!
A brief internet search tells me that the first "real" movie was made in the late 1890's, & that "talkies" were first introduced in the late 1920's. That would explain why this film had very little dialog, & why the soundtrack did not reflect all that was happening (for example, a handkerchief being ripped did not make a sound). I always associate overacting & too much make-up with early films, but the acting in this movie wasn't so dramatic, & the people looked normal.
One week indeed! But what was the point of the whole thing? Maybe it'll come to me later.
One of the few films that I liked as well as the book. Perhaps it's because the author of the book, Sijie Dai, also wrote the screenplay & directed the movie.
A complicated, interconnected heist gone wrong & gone right at the same time. It reminded me of Snatch, also written & directed by Guy Ritchie, also starring Jason Statham. The accents are thick, so I had to listen hard. Even so I was thoroughly entertained.
NOT a Bollywood movie. This film was produced by IFC.
Whoa. Heavy stuff.